What to use instead of Stock Rover

The product

We list Stock Rover ourselves, and its card is the full account of it: plans, metric counts, history depth, coverage and limits, verified in September 2026. Its prices were re-read on the vendor's plans page on 9 October 2026 and had not moved. This page does not replace the card. It answers the narrower question a Stock Rover user asks once one of its limits starts to bite: what else does this job, and what does the switch cost.

Stock Rover is a fundamental screener and a portfolio analytics workspace in one browser tab. The screener is why most people subscribe: 400-plus metrics at the entry tier and 800-plus at the top, 150-plus prebuilt screens from Piotroski to Greenblatt, ranked screening with per-metric weights. The other half is portfolio management through read-only brokerage sync: IRR and time-weighted returns side by side, Sharpe, beta and drawdown against the S&P 500, rebalancing, correlation and Monte Carlo, on every paid tier. The tiers sell history and headroom rather than features — Premium 29 a month billed annually, Premium Plus 49, Ultimate 79, Ultimate Pro 149, or 34, 70, 99 and 199 month to month.

The reasons a holder looks elsewhere are specific:

• North America only. US and Canadian listings plus ETFs and mutual funds. No European or Asian stock at any price.
• No API, and export is metered. CSV only, at 10, 90, 500 or 2,500 files a month by plan, and trial accounts cannot export at all.
• No backtest. Historical screening on Premium Plus filters on past values; it does not simulate buying the result and holding it.
• Real-time quotes start at Ultimate. Below 79 a month, the plan comparison marks quotes as delayed.
• The entry tier is metered. Twenty Fair Value and score lookups and ten Stock Ratings a month outside the Dow 30, and Research Reports as a separate 50-dollar subscription.
• No tax or realised-gain reporting, which is where most portfolio trackers earn their keep.

What to use instead

For Stock Rover set against the two products it is most often weighed with, see Finviz vs Stock Rover vs TradingView, which ends on which reader lands where.

If the wall is geography. Koyfin is the browser terminal for global equities — ten years of financials and consensus estimates from 49 a month, screens over the same universe — and TIKR is the same Capital IQ data with transcripts, from 24.95. Both read as research desks rather than trackers. Uncle Stock screens listings in 79 countries on deep fundamentals. GuruFocus sells nine regions one at a time. Koyfin vs TIKR splits those two.

If the wall is testing a screen. Portfolio123 is built for exactly this: a weighted ranking system, a screen on top of it, and point-in-time simulations of buying the top of the list, from 116 a month on the Backtest plan. Uncle Stock backtests a screen with yearly rebalancing from Silver at 35; GuruFocus includes five-year screener backtests at Premium.

If the wall is depth of history. GuruFocus's 30-year financials tab is what its users renew for, at 549 a year for the US; Stock Rover's 20-year fundamentals are on Ultimate at 79 a month.

If the screen was the whole use. Finviz Elite is faster and shallower — real-time quotes, 10-second refresh, CSV and Excel export, eight years of statements for reading — at 39.50 a month. Stock Analysis is the free version of the same idea, with a screener that needs no account. TradingView fits if you opened the screener on the way to a chart.

If what you used was the portfolio side. That is a different shopping list: portfolio trackers, and for dividends and tax lots in particular the trackers that report realised gains, which Stock Rover does not.

The other screeners are listed together in the stock screeners collection.

What you give up

Screening and portfolio analytics on one bill. On Stock Rover the portfolio analytics are on every paid tier from 29 a month. Koyfin's portfolio analytics and alerts begin at Premium, 110 a month. TIKR's portfolio is a watchlist with valuation columns and no return calculation. Uncle Stock calls its own portfolio feature lightweight, with no broker sync. Splitting the two jobs usually means two subscriptions.

Brokerage sync on a screener. Stock Rover links brokerages through Yodlee, with a direct feed for Interactive Brokers. Koyfin never links your own holdings; TIKR and Uncle Stock do not link them at all. Among the picks, Stock Analysis syncs brokerage accounts into a portfolio and GuruFocus imports from brokers.

The prebuilt screen library. 150-plus named screens — Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, Greenblatt, Lynch — are ready on day one. GuruFocus ships its own strategy-named screens; most other picks expect you to build yours.

Price per metric. 400-plus metrics and five years of fundamentals for 29 a month billed annually is cheap against GuruFocus at 549 a year or Koyfin Plus at 49 a month. Only Stock Analysis and Finviz Elite come in below it, and both are shallower.

Migration notes

Export before the plan ends, and know the meter. CSV export is capped per month by plan, and Stock Rover issues no refunds, so do the export in the last paid month rather than after downgrading. Screens leave as criteria you retype, not as files another product reads.

The same screen will return a different list. Two vendors' "free cash flow yield" can be built from different line items, periods and price dates, and Koyfin, TIKR, Stock Rover and GuruFocus do not all license the same fundamentals. The guide on why two screeners disagree covers the usual causes; diff the two lists before acting on the new one.

Cost basis may not survive the broker relink. A new tracker re-reads your brokerage through its own aggregator, and what comes across depends on what that aggregator and the broker expose — see how aggregators reach your brokerage and carrying cost basis across a transfer.